I want the 'choice' to kill exhusband please Court

I read the headlines only of that PR propaganda piece of inflammatory rhetoric by the demoncrats saying that republicans are 'pro-choice". Well that's a lie from the devil. But if that were true,i.e the 'choice to kill " then the 'right" I want is the right to kill my second exhusband for his crimes of violence against me, and his theft of my name and his theft of my belongings, and his attempt to steal my inheritance, and his evil, vile ways.
If there is a such a right as the choice to kill when do I get to kill him? Should I shoot him or what? I am not very familiar with killing 'unwanted' people so how to go about it? Should I pay an assassin the way evil women pay abortionists to murder? Should I get someone to drag him into the abortuary killing center and dismember and decapitate him the way abortionists kill innocents in the womb? How does a person kill a grown up UNWANTED scourge on humanity as my second exhusband?
Any ideas? Because you see, the wicked Pres of the US says there is a 'right' to kill unwanted humans. SO the human I want to kill is my second exhusband. IS that also a 'right" then that's the 'choice' I want but keep the innocents and wanted babies in the womb of women everywhere. Let's kill all the lawyers, and all the wicked on Supreme Court,and in Congress, and all the wicked abortionists, and all the mass murderers and be done with it. What say ye?
Gloria Poole, Missouri

Scott Roeder: HERO of the unborn/preborn

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8486794.stm

From this article in the BBC news for the Americas today, is this quote:
""I did what I thought was needed to be done to protect the children," Scott Roeder told the court in Wichita, Kansas. "I shot him."
Now here's the thing. Years ago when my oldest daughter was tiny and my youngest daughter was not born yet, I worked as a Peer Review Nurse for a Medical Peer Review Foundation, and that involved traveling across one of the 50 states to review nursing homes of both the skilled and intermediate care varieties and the delivery of health care practices to see if they were compliant with the then-existing "rules and regs' of Medicare and or Medicaid. During that time, on one of the visits away from my hometown about 4-5 hours from my home, I was at a working lunch with other Peer Reviewers, and I expressed my anxiety about my daughter Jennifer who was not yet four at home with her daddy at night but at a in-home day-care during his work day. I was having that terrible anxiety mothers get when they leave their children for any length of time. On that particular job-related trip I had left home on a Monday am, traveled across the state, and was still there on the job 4 days later because of the size of the facility to be reviewed. Ok, I wrote that background so you'd know the scenario. In the course of the conversation, I said something like I really worried because who would protect my daughter from harm? If in the unlikely event someone broke into our surburban home and tried to harm her. The social worker who was male said to me, "so what if you were there, what could you do if that happened?" I said, 'I'd shoot the intruder on the spot." He said "you would not. It's not in you." I said 'believe me, I would. I would not think twice about it. If someone broke into my home and it was obvious he intended to harm my daughter, I'd shoot him dead." Everyone at the table paused. They said, 'none of us believe you could or would do that." I said, 'you're wrong. I would. I would not let anyone harm my daughter, I'd shoot to kill, if I even thought that he intended harm to my daughter."
Now Scott Roeder has done that. He shot a mass murderer of innocents and he admitted it. He said he did it to save the lives of the innocent. I see no difference in what he did and what the Columbine Colorado Police Officers did at Columbine that day when they shot those boys who shot other students to death. Because one shooter of a mass murderer was wearing a police uniform and a badge, and one was not, and one was trained by the city and one was self-trained, the motives were exactly the same--to save the lives of others who were truly innocent. It is public record that what Scott Roeder did, shut down that horrible abortion killing center. It is public record that he said he did it to save the lives of innocent human babies. I think the man's a hero. And I suspect if this were a TV drama instead of real life situation, and the man who did the shooting shot and killed someone breaking into a big NY bank for instance, the viewing audience would think the shooter was a hero. I think Scott Roeder is a hero for the unborn/preborn humans.
(s) Gloria Poole, Missouri; Friday, January 29, 2010 @07:47:39 AM
PS: Also please see the medical photos of the unborn children as they look in the amniotic sac at http://sites.google.com/site/humans-in-womb-photos/
and also please see http://www.home.earthlink.net/~prolife-activist for the Bible scriptures about human life; and please see http://www.home.earthlink.net/~vote-prolife for reasons why abortion is destroying the nation and how it violates the Amendments of the U S Constitution which is the true law of the land.

Scott Roeder killed a mass murderer who defied GOD

See this website of medical photos as human babies appear inside the amniotic sac, and some that were aborted whole intact tiny humans; then read articles please.
http://sites.google.com/site/newsforlife/humans-in-womb-photos/

There is an article in the Columbia Tribune today written by Maria Sudekum Fisher presents the prolife point of view that Defense Attorneys are presenting and that is that killing a mass murderer [abortionist] is not unjustified, and that reasonable people could and would act in like manner. Does not a Police officer trained to kill shoot to kill IF his life is threatened? Why should the lives of MANY innocent human babies be considered less worthy of life than a Police Officer's?

This quote from that article:
"Roeder's attorneys are expected to try to build a case for a conviction of voluntary manslaughter, which is defined in Kansas as "an unreasonable but honest belief that circumstances existed that justified deadly force." Roeder said in a court filing that he believed the killing would save "preborn babies" from abortion." [end quote]
Read the article at: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ABORTION_SHOOTING_TRIAL?SITE=MOCOD&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

This following was posted before and I am adding it again for the sake of emphasis and to bring pressure on the Courts regarding the case of Scott Roeder who shot and killed a mass murderer who was violating the Church with his presence by serving as an usher while killing methodically and regularly the innocents created by GOD:
See these websites also and then read the article:
http://sites.google.com/site/newsforlife/humans-in-womb-photos/
http://sites.google.com/site/publishinglife
http://www.google.com/profiles/publishinglife/
12:47 PM 1/21/2010
The infozine of Kansas City reminds the nation of the March for Life today in Washington. Yes, but it has become an annual event that is taken for granted.
It seems to me that when the prolifers start taking down the bricks of the U S Capitol then they will be taken seriously as meaning to change the status quo of killing innocents in America. The same legislators that have relentless concern [they say] about the terrorism in places ten thousand miles away, have little or no concern
for the terrorism in America in the killing fields called abortion centers. I refuse
to call such evil places 'clinics' since that implies that there are medical licensed
staff there. There usually are NO licensed or skilled staff in abortuaries except the
hired assassin of innocents. The same news networks that send journalists half-way
around the world to cover fighting in nations that has no impact on the soil of
America, refuse adamantly to cover the dead in the abortion battle. They all ought
to be ashamed--too ashamed to hold their heads up or look decent folks in the eye.
The people in this nation--the MAJORITY of people in this nation are PROLIFE and
are opposed to the premeditated slaughter of innocents in the womb. Those statics are in the Infozine today and I quote it.

I quote from article in infozine.com:
From May 2008 to May 2009, the majority public opinion on abortion has shifted,
according to Gallup Polls.

In 2008, 44 percent of adults polled described themselves as "pro-life" and in 2009,
that number rose to 51 percent.

The 2009 poll also found 60 percent of adults said abortion should either be illegal in all circumstances; or legal only in a few.
Read article at:

http://www.infozine.com/news/stories/op/storiesView/sid/39624/
7:00 AM 1/22/2010
And to answer the question of what's wrong with Kansas? It allowed a heathen and
vile baby-killer to have protection of its medical establishment and the good people of Kansas revolted against that. The man who killed that abortionist deserves a
medal of honor in my opinion and I personally wish he'd killed ALL the abortionists in America to save the nation from the destruction of GOD. He should be labeled a hero by prolifers! He shut down that horror of the third trimester killing of humans in the womb--baby humans! A man who killed an assassin of baby humans is on trial, and if he had not killed a mass murderer his trial would have been delayed for months or years but since that organization from hell named Planned Parenthood which is really planned UNparenthood since their goal is to assassinate all unborn children, wants to make an example of him to coinicide with the March for Life.
IO think history will show that man to be of the same caliber as the man of the Harper's Ferry event in Virginia which was intended to bring about an end to slavery. Fighting the status quo takes radical measures because the US Congress has never had the backbone to do the right thing. Even now they are trying to finangle some scam way to legalize the premeditated killing of innocents by attempting to label it as 'health care' when it is NOT health care but a horror--an evil worst than the gassing of Jews in the Nazi era of history because the Jews that were gassed were out of the womb, able to think, run, fight back, write letters, but the people then as now in the US followed the wicked like lambs to the slaughter.
I am NOT ever quitting the battle for the right of humans to be born alive, the right of ALL humans conceived to be born alive. I am not quitting this battle!
Please see the medical photos of humans as they look in the womb at:
http://sites.google.com/site/newsforlife/humans-in-womb-photos/
and also see http://www.google.com/profiles/publishing.life [or if that is not right there may not be a dot between the words publishing and life.
(s) Gloria Poole, Missouri; 22-Jan-2010 @ 7:31 AM, central time.
PS I had to add this same entry twice since Obama is trying to censor prolife citizens by tryiog to kill their computers. And then I had to click through dozens of 'scripts' that were trying to block me adding content to my own blog! Communism suppression is the modus operandi of the Obama KGB of communism.

Gloria Poole, Missouri, RN licensed in Colorado, and artist in oils,acrylics, watercolors, powdered pastels, pen/inks, charcoal, graphite. Tuesday, January 26, 2010 @8:43:11 AM

Prolifers Unite! Defeat Terrorism in the Womb

See these websites also and then read the article:
http://sites.google.com/site/newsforlife/humans-in-womb-photos/
http://sites.google.com/site/publishinglife
http://www.google.com/profiles/publishinglife/
12:47 PM 1/21/2010
The infozine of Kansas City reminds the nation of the March for Life today in Washington. Yes, but it has become an annual event that is taken for granted.
It seems to me that when the prolifers start taking down the bricks of the U S Capitol then they will be taken seriously as meaning to change the status quo of killing innocents in America. The same legislators that have relentless concern [they say] about the terrorism in places ten thousand miles away, have little or no concern
for the terrorism in America in the killing fields called abortion centers. I refuse
to call such evil places 'clinics' since that implies that there are medical licensed
staff there. There usually are NO licensed or skilled staff in abortuaries except the
hired assassin of innocents. The same news networks that send journalists half-way
around the world to cover fighting in nations that has no impact on the soil of
America, refuse adamantly to cover the dead in the abortion battle. They all ought
to be ashamed--too ashamed to hold their heads up or look decent folks in the eye.
The people in this nation--the MAJORITY of people in this nation are PROLIFE and
are opposed to the premeditated slaughter of innocents in the womb. Those statics are in the Infozine today and I quote it.

I quote from article in infozine.com:
From May 2008 to May 2009, the majority public opinion on abortion has shifted,
according to Gallup Polls.

In 2008, 44 percent of adults polled described themselves as "pro-life" and in 2009,
that number rose to 51 percent.

The 2009 poll also found 60 percent of adults said abortion should either be illegal in all circumstances; or legal only in a few.
Read article at:

http://www.infozine.com/news/stories/op/storiesView/sid/39624/
7:00 AM 1/22/2010
And to answer the question of what's wrong with Kansas? It allowed a heathen and
vile baby-killer to have protection of its medical establishment and the good people of Kansas revolted against that. The man who killed that abortionist deserves a
medal of honor in my opinion and I personally wish he'd killed ALL the abortionists in America to save the nation from the destruction of GOD. He should be labeled a hero by prolifers! He shut down that horror of the third trimester killing of humans in the womb--baby humans! A man who killed an assassin of baby humans is on trial, and if he had not killed a mass murderer his trial would have been delayed for months or years but since that organization from hell named Planned Parenthood which is really planned UNparenthood since their goal is to assassinate all unborn children, wants to make an example of him to coinicide with the March for Life.
IO think history will show that man to be of the same caliber as the man of the Harper's Ferry event in Virginia which was intended to bring about an end to slavery. Fighting the status quo takes radical measures because the US Congress has never had the backbone to do the right thing. Even now they are trying to finangle some scam way to legalize the premeditated killing of innocents by attempting to label it as 'health care' when it is NOT health care but a horror--an evil worst than the gassing of Jews in the Nazi era of history because the Jews that were gassed were out of the womb, able to think, run, fight back, write letters, but the people then as now in the US followed the wicked like lambs to the slaughter.
I am NOT ever quitting the battle for the right of humans to be born alive, the right of ALL humans conceived to be born alive. I am not quitting this battle!
Please see the medical photos of humans as they look in the womb at:
http://sites.google.com/site/newsforlife/humans-in-womb-photos/
and also see http://www.google.com/profiles/publishing.life [or if that is not right there may not be a dot between the words publishing and life.
(s) Gloria Poole, Missouri; 22-Jan-2010 @ 7:31 AM, central time.
PS I had to add this same entry twice since Obama is trying to censor prolife citizens by tryiog to kill their computers. And then I had to click through dozens of 'scripts' that were trying to block me adding content to my own blog! Communism suppression is the modus operandi of the Obama KGB of communism.

Praise GOD for Rep Stupak, PROLIFER! & protest killing

I read an article in the NY Times today that was also in the Google news last evening and it gives me hope! Rep Stupak, prolifer, is prepared to stop the train barralling down the rails in Congress because of the words in it that include abortion as 'health care'. I say thank GOD for Rep Stupak and may the Hand of GOD hold him up, embolden him, give him courage and strength to withstand the evil onslaught from the baby-killing industry, for the sake of millions of unborn/preborn humans; and may GOD use him in a mighty way! That is my prayer for him, that he stops the bad bill steamrolling over the Constitution, and over the unborn, and over the elderly, and over the handicapped, by stopping that bill being discussed as health care when it is everything but health care! It does violate the constitution in many ways. It does create new unfunded mandates on the citizens. It does provide for killing off the population. It does protect BIG INSURANCE scams, and it does implement socialism but it does NOT deliver health care to anyone.

The article is at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/07/us/politics/07stupak.html?hp/

(s) Gloria Poole, Missouri;
Update at 10:41 am after reading another article in the NY Times today that was touting as a role model that ungodly plan of Massachusetts. I tell you I was in the Massachusetts so-called health care system for a few hours [ER] and it is awful! It is the worst system I ever endured. They are careless, indifferent, unconcerned about patients. They treated me as if were garbage to be gotten rid of quickly. They cared nothing whatsoever about me as a patient.I would not take my dog there. And apparently there are others who felt the same since the now dead Ted Kennedy who ought to know since he had much input into the development of that awful system, did NOT go to it for his surgery or his treatment. Oh no--he wanted a hospital in the South that was more likely to dispense LIFE-giving approach when he needed health care. I think that says it all. Kennedy totally rejected Massachusetts ' health care system. Enough said. I hated Kennedy because he helped annihilate millions of innocents in the womb and he deserved the death GOD sent his way, but the fact that he knew the ropes of Massachusetts socialized medicine and opted out of it, says a whole lot politically. It is not an improvement on health care and the Massachusetts' system is awful.
Update at 8:52 PM after reading article in CNN about the human organ trafficking of the Dept of Health and Human Svcs of the U S.
"- the private, nonprofit organization that contracts with the Department of Health and Human Services to allocate donated organs -- "
This quote is from an article about human organ transplants. Well, I did not know how closely connected the many deaths in many places is to the Dept of Health and Human Services, until I read an article in CNN.
In the article you'll notice that it mentions nations that traffic in human organs while at the same time pretending that DHHS doesn't do that. It's the same grim evil whether it is in the U S it happens or abroad. Using human body parts to negotiate anything is macabre and disgusting and it is a violation of GOD's prohibition against touching a dead body.
Read the article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/01/07/california.transplant.indictment/
Thursday, January 07, 2010 @ 8:48:28 PM
see http://gloriapoole.com
http://gloriapoole-RN.net
http://gloriapoole.info
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~gloria-poole for more info.

The Treachery Continues in Congress to impose slavery

From AP article in the Yahoo news today at 3:50 pm, 6-Jan-2010; and read my comments at the bottom of the quotes :
"They [the Speaker of the US House and the other democrats who are trying to sneak by the Constitution] agreed that rather than setting up a formal conference committee to resolve differences between health bills passed last year by the House and Senate, the House will work off the Senate's version, amend it and send it back to the Senate for final passage, according to a House leadership aide, speaking on condition of anonymity in order to discuss the private meeting."
And here are the words of the U S Constitution on the matters of powers of Congress, duties of Congress, and duties of the President,quoted from the U S Constitution:
Section 7 - Revenue Bills, Legislative Process, Presidential Veto
All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.
Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively. If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.
Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill.
Section 8 - Powers of Congress
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;
To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;
To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
To provide and maintain a Navy;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
Section 9 - Limits on Congress
The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
(No capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.) (Section in parentheses clarified by the 16th Amendment.)
No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.
No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.
No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.
Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

Article II - The Executive Branch Note
Section 1 - The President Note1 Note2
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice-President chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows:
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
(The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two persons, of whom one at least shall not lie an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; a quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two-thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice-President.) (This clause in parentheses was superseded by the 12th Amendment.)
The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
(In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.) (This clause in parentheses has been modified by the 20th and 25th Amendments.)
The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.
Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Section 2 - Civilian Power over Military, Cabinet, Pardon Power, Appointments
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session
To summarize more of the reasons why I think the fiasco of the Obama-driven refinancing package for America is unconstitutional:
1) It gives preference to certain democratic-stronghold states in exchange for votes, violating Section 9 and also violates section II of Article IV.
2) It is attempt to use its power of reprisal against the citizens of the nation and not the enemies of the nation. Reprisal means a forcible seizure of property, and money is property.
3) It is an attempt to lay a direct tax on the citizens in the form of mandated payments to agenices authorized, designated by the U S government, and as such is a violation of the U S Constitution's Section 9, since it is not in 'poportion to the Census"
4) It is an attempt to create public law defining new rights but it does not follow the written procedure of Amending the Constitution as written. I quote from Constitution:
Article V - Amendment Note1 - Note2 - Note3
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
5) It violates amendment 8 regarding excessive fines and unusual punishments for the newly created crime of being poor. I quote amendment 8:
Amendment 8 - Cruel and Unusual Punishment. Ratified 12/15/1791.
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted
6) It violates amendment 10 of the Constitution since the duties of Congress as enumerated in Secton 8: powers of Congress do not include mandating how citizens spend their money. I quote amendment 10:
Amendment 10 - Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
7) It violates amendment 13 since it intends to make every citizen a slave of insurance companies to do their bidding and support them financially. I quote that amendment:
Amendment 13 - Slavery Abolished. Ratified 12/6/1865. History
1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
8) It violates amendment 14 by abriding the privileges of citizens by forcing them to pay for services that the Congress intends to make available to those who are not citizens. I quote that sentence of that amendment:
Info on the U S Constitution from this source: http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A1Sec1/
Wednesday, January 06, 2010 @4:23:46 PM; Missouri
(s) Gloria Poole
Update to add in this:
CNBC videotaped interview with Dr Scott Gottlieb discussing as a physician the proposed bills that regulate health care and shift the decisions of who gets health care to the doctors deciding based upon how much/little they will be penalized by government for their decisions:
Dr Scott Gottlieb speaking on the plan being discussed:
http://news.yahoo.com/video/business-15749628/17364863/
A quote Dr Gottlieb said tongue in cheek no doubt really made me realize he knows what is going on there in Congress and it is 'elections have consequences'.
Let us all pray that in the next election, common sense is one of the expected qualities of any leader.

No Secretive Gov't in US; NO KGB. Open GOVT

"C-SPAN CEO Brian Lamb wrote to leaders in the House and Senate Dec. 30 urging them to open "all important negotiations, including any conference committee meetings," to televised coverage on his network.
"The C-SPAN networks will commit the necessary resources to covering all of the sessions LIVE and in their entirety," he wrote. " This quote is from an article in the Fox News today about C-SPAN the TV network that covers the activities of Congress.
Also that article makes the point that Obama said one thing in his campaign but does another behaving exactly as all Presidents for the past 40 yrs have done and that is secretive, sneaky negotiations away from the Press and the public eye.
Tuesday, January 05, 2010 @9:55:03 AM
And the NY Times has published the same plea from Brian Lamb to allow the people of the US to see and hear the discussions on 'health care' that are efforts to radically rewrite the US Constitution including the right to life. This quote from the NY Times today:"In a letter to House and Senate leaders Tuesday, C-SPAN chief executive Brian Lamb asked for negotiations on a compromise bill to be opened up for public viewing." and this quote:
"Instead the most critical negotiations on Obama's health plan have taken place behind closed doors, as Republicans repeatedly point out."

Those secretive deals have turned out bad every time. The amendment to legalize taxes on income was blank as history recorded and the Congress was bamboozled with tricks, pressure, subterfuge, fake promises to 'just trust me' used-car-salesman-approach. The U S cannot afford such government and neither could any nation. The decisions that won't bear up under repeated and full debate are not good decisions, and that is why they fail. Some resolutions
--> bills are so bad they shuuld be defeated absolutely, and the health care refinancing scheme is one of those. It does not affect health care delivery in a positive way but instead shifts money from the sick to the well, and from those in the waning years of life to those in the young, able-bodied able to work set of people, and it also is attempting to provide, even though against all citizens' protests, the money from the federal treasury to pay for abortions in an effort to codify into public law what is not law now, and that is the so-called but false right to abortion. There is NO right to abortion. A new right has to be called a constitutional amendment and the discussions are along those lines AND the Congress must vote in session, AND the people [citizens who are registered to vote] must also vote on it AND 2/3 of the states have to ratify it before it becomes an Amendment. That has not ever happened and there is no such right as the right to an abortion, nor is there any such right as the 'right to health care promises". Either of those would require a Constitutional Amendment and that has not happened and the bill being discussed it not approached as a Constitutional Amendment and therefore it has NO constitutional basis or authority. There is also NO such right as the right of Congress to tell citizens how to spend their money or what to buy. The bill being discussed is a RADICAL rewrite of the laws of this nation and it is aimed at implementing socialism not providing health care. It is about regulating every industry that has any contact with health care: hospitals, doctors, nurses, insurers, contractors who build those places, schools that teach doctors and nurses, etc,etc,etc. It is an effort to codify the evil of abortion. It is an effort to codify the 'duty' to die when one gets old instead of using 'resources' to stay alive. It is an effort to pump massive amounts of drugs into the U S citizenry one by one. It is evil. It does not provide for better care or more care but less by taking money from Medicare and Medicaid and giving it to lawyers and insurers and Peer Review boards to decide who gets any sort of health care and by what method and where, and from whom?
Congress just vote NO. Ignore the pressure of Obama bobble head BIG EGO. Don't talk to insurers--they are not in the health care delivery business at all. Don't talk to anyone on the subject of delivery of health care but bona-fide doctors and nurses. Ignore the other special interests who are out to get government mandated incomes for themselves like that touchy feely massage therapy intimate sex-enticing 'massages' that are often lately touted as 'health care' and those emotional psycho-babble shops that sell drugs by the ton, as the 'cure'.
Just vote NO. It's a deal with the devil to vote for that plnn that is intended to rewrite health care to killing methods.
(s) Gloria Poole, RN, licensed in Colorado still though I live now in Missouri.
Update at 2:53 PM after reading about Casey Johnson's death and seeing that horrible disgusting abominable video she made with her lesbian friend. I think Casey Johnson died because she mocked GOD. To read more on that topic, read my blog for today at:
http://gloriapoole.wordpress.com/

If you're looking to die, Colorado glad to oblige you

I read a series of letters in the NY Times today on the topic of 'terminal sedation' which essentially is drugging a patient to death. I am opposed to that forever.And I especially hated that letter from that wicked fool in Colorado! And my reasons are:
1) Killing of the sick, disabled, weak, 'terminal' is a crime or it should be.
2) it is not the duty of medical doctors to kill on demand. To do that makes them no better in my opinion than hired assassins, who are glad to 'terminate' someone for a fee.
3) The public will not ever trust health care decision makers as long as the discussion is about who, when and how the sick die. When the debate becomes how they live,then there will be more enthusiam for the rewriting of health care delivery.
4) Doctors are not GOD, and they may be able to predict a patient's death but to cause a patient's death has to be illegal, in a civilized society.
5) Patients don't always die when they are predicted too. As one wise MD said long ago on grand rounds, 'patients don't read medical textbooks' meaning that they have their own course of response to medicines, treatments even surgery--each being a unique individual.
6) The public trust is absolutely essential to the functioning of health care and for that matter any publicly licensed entity. When the public doubts whether their doctor will 'predict ' death then accomplish that with drugs, or help them live, patients will quit going to doctors and turn to other methods of healing. Maybe it is time to do that--seek the vitamins and good diet, and common sense approach to life and well-being instead of mega-drama in hospitals with a toss of the coin as to who lives and who dies. Dying at home of natural causes is certainly more desirable than being drugged to death in a cold, foreign [as in not in your own bed] environment surrounded by trigger-happy with syringes psychopath doctors or nurses who get their jollies dispatching people to the other realm.
7) There is hair line difference in what those letters call terminal sedation and active intentional euthanasia which itself is a supposedly secretive word for medical killing. It is abhorrent to me. And killing whether by medical doctors/nurses or assassins is a sin against GOD who wrote in stone, 'thou shalt not kill'. Exodus 20:13.
It does not surprise me that Colorado birthplace of the heinous sin/crime of premeditated murders in the womb, is now trying to expand their killing business to include other 'unwanteds' also. The state of JonBenet Ramsey, and Columbine has as its claim to fame the numbers of people killed there or maimed annually by their drug-whacked population. Avoid them like the Bubonic plague! And NEVER take advice from any one who thinks he or she has a 'right ' or a 'duty' to kill! Flee from evil the Bible says.
(s) Gloria Poole, Missouri.