Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Congress Vote NO to Kagan, she's bad for nation;ruinous

Congress just vote NO to Kagan. She is bad for the nation because:
1) she is for killing of innocents in womb and nearly born; wants to depopulate nation to destroy it.
2) She is anti-military and thinks 'elites" have no duty to serve the nation in the military.She prevented ROTC [to train officers] from recruiting at Harvard.
3) She is patently dishonest, hiding the truth with jokes, and smart mouth replies.
4) She is arrogant beyond belief, not humble.
5) She is a friend of Obama and so is Blagojevich, Roland Burris, Rahm Emanuel, and the Corrupt Chicago Politick.
And I quote from an article written by Julie Hirschfeld Davis for the AP and in the news.yahoo.com a few minutes ago {12:05PM,20-July-2010]:
"The Susan B. Anthony List, an anti-abortion rights group, wrote to senators Monday urging opposition [to Kagan] based on Kagan's actions as a Clinton administration official to resist a broad ban on a procedure opponents call partial-birth abortion."
Full Congress:Vote NO to her, put the nation ahead of Obama's ego.
Gloria Poole; at my home in Missouri, 8:38 AM, 20-July-2010
Update at 9:32 after reading the NY Times for today with a change of topic somewhat but necessary to inform the citizens:
David Brooks of the NY Times wrote an astounding [for the NY Times] article today
exposing the truth of the Obama administration. I quote from his article:
"In the second part of the period, Democrats were in control.
They augmented the national security bureaucracy but spent the bulk
of their energies expanding bureaucracies in domestic spheres.
First, they passed a health care law. This law created 183 new agencies,
commissions, panels and other bodies, according to an analysis by
Robert E. Moffit of the Heritage Foundation. These include things
like the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program,
an Interagency Pain Research Coordinating Committee and a Cures Acceleration Network Review Board. "
He also reiterates what the Washington Post wrote about yesterday, how
the federal government greatly expanded in the name of 'homeland security'
in the years 2001-2010. He said there are 10,000 sites around the country
spying on the citizens,for 1200 government agencies, and 1,900 private
agencies employing 854000 people with top level security clearance [which means
they get access to your passport, bank account, driver's license, emails,
US mail, school and university records, landlord records, virtually every
sort of documentation known to the human race. ] Read his article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/opinion/20brooks.html?hp/
9:31 AM 7/20/2010
And oh yea/before I forget, when did the PRIVATE citizen of the Clinton's 30- something yr old daughter getting married become a matter of a 'state secret" as the Clinton PR/propaganda machinery is trying to pump into the news today? She did not serve this nation and she is not entitled to a wedding at taxpayer expense!
Gloria Poole, [RN] 9:33AM,20-July-2010; at my home in Missouri
Update again after reading more of the news today in the http://news.yahoo.com section:
In an article entitled, "SEC Chief Points to Stepped Up Enforcement" written by Marcy Gordon for the AP Business news, is this astounding news:
Goldman is paying $550 million directly to the SEC, in supposed 'fines' for illegal activities. Here's the thing; the SEC needs $1.2 billion to operate their rubber-stamping machinery that approves fraud deals and ponzi schemes and it seems that Goldman has ponied up half that amount for influence buying and look-the-other-way-on-our-crooked-deals-in-future deals. Could you spell f-r-a-u-d-, c-o-r-r-u-p-t-i-o-n perpetrated on taxpayers?
Companies that are found guilty of fraud create an incentive to the SEC by giving them raises, perqs and enormous 'bonuses' for lack of a more precise word there, instead of creating an incentive NOT to break the law. A better and more effective way to deal with corporate fraud, theft, and corruption is to send them to prison.
Gloria Poole; 10:40AM, 20-July-2010; at my home in Missouri

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home