Reply to" ...Gov't shouldn't answer..."

In the Yahoo news this evening is an article stating that the U S government should not get involved in saving the future of the nation. Of course the writer did not state it that way. Instead, to earn his planned unparenthood pay he was promoting the idea that it does not concern the Government of the U S if there is methodical and premeditated killing of innocent BABIES on every corner. If journalists were required to disclose their sources of income, I am sure we as a nation would know who paid for that op-ed piece of propaganda, but since Journalists enjoy what is loosely defined as First Amendment rights that they think applies only to them, the writer of that inflammatory and evil article could conceal his planned parenthood salary or stipend.

I am going to take the concept he was spinning and put into it the other classes of people of the world and then pray that you see through his fake argument for premeditated killing as a so-called right. He asserts that women have the right to kill. So I want to make what he said so obvious, so plain,as to be in your face with it, so you comprehend how evil his sneaky words really are. He said abortion has always been around and it is not the duty of government to interfere in that evil. So let us apply those words in these ways:
1) Killing of black men has always been around and it is not the duty of government to interfere in it.
2) Killing of Jews has always been around and it is not the duty of government to interfere in it.
3) Killing of unwanted wives has always been around and it is not the duty of government to interfere in it.
4) Killing of unwanted husbands has always been around and it is not the duty of government to interfere in it.
5) Killing of those who park on the side of the street has always been around and it is not the duty of government to interfere in it.
6) Killing of abusive men has always been around and it is not the duty of government to interfere in it.
7) Killing of men who have marital affairs has always been around and it is not the duty of government to interfere with it.
8) Killing of women who won't give any man passerby s-ex has always been around and it is not the duty of government to interfere in it.
9) Killing of Palestinians has always been around and it is not the duty of government to interfere in it.
10) Killing of male children when a woman wanted a girl baby has always been around and it is not the duty of government to interfere in it.

I pray you see how evil those words are, and they are not what I believe. I am writing to make you think. Thinking is very rare in America where most people believe what they were spoon-fed by propagandists as 'media'. I believe that premeditated killing is always a wrong never a right, and I believe it is exactly the duty of government to interfere to stop the killing! I wrote those that way because a paid propagandist for planned parenthood wrote an article using that evil argument as his reason for why abortion should be funded by taxpayers.
If premeditated killing is to become a so-called right in America, I suggest we as a nation, start with those who work for Planned [Un]parenthood first and kill them, then kill all the lawyers, then kill all the sodomites, then kill all the cigarette smokers, then kill all the alcoholics, then kill all the cocaine addicts, then kill all the wife-abusers. We could eliminate most of the problems with health care if we followed that plan of killing and let the babies in the womb be born alive.

(s) Gloria Poole, Missouri.