Congress: Vote NO to mandated killing plans
I am adding this photo of a human being in the amniotic sac to my blog today to remind the folks in Congress that a human being in the womb is human, and needs the full faith and credit clause protections of the U S government, and all state governments also. The debate that concerns me that is finally appearing today in the NY Times, though it was the issue all along but they tried to hide it, about whether federal subsidies to help poor women buy 'insurance' should be allowed to be applied to plans that kill. And whether the fake reform bill should include killing as fake medical care. Of course they shouldn't. And there should be no plan to kill in any legitimate insurance policy. And there should be no plan to use U S taxpayer monies to pay for killing of citizens either and that includes that evil hospice. Only a fool could miss the danger in plans that have provisions to kill off people whether in the womb, or in their 80's or 90's or handicapped in some way including Down's children. A plan that is controlled by the government [as government option would be] and that includes provisions to kill the 'unwanted' well, where does that lead? Could you spell N-a-z-i M-e-d-i-c-i-n-e?
Remember in the Holocaust it was medical doctors licensed by the government who 'triaged' on the train platforms sending some to death via gassing with Chemical B [Zyklon B or something like that]. And they based their appointment to destruction upon the physical appearance of a person stepping off a train onto a platform for a few second 'physical' of their strength and ability to work the concentration camps whether they lived or died. That scenario also happened in Soviet nation that was then the USSR when Stalin had gulags that Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn wrote about. * At present the so-called Plan B of the prodeathers also involves chemicals used to kill the tininest in the womb--the class of humans you see in the photo above.
If the United States has become too poor to allow children and intends to start paying companies to kill off those in the womb, then I am asking all nations on behalf of the good people of the United States who have opposed killing, to rise up and fight against such evil politically. Make your voices heard in the halls of Congress. Oppose premeditated mass murders of innocents in the womb. Oppose Obama's plan to annihilate the children of the world. Oppose evil, defy the devil; but obey GOD and do not accept killing as a so-called right! There is no right to kill. Congress must not codify any such right as a right to kill by sneaky underhanded legislation pretending to reform insurance when their real goal is to codify the premeditated killing of offspring as a 'right' . Don't be deceived by those who think killing is a right. Do not listen to them. Do not make any agreements with them. Do not accept their advice on any topic.
The first verse of book of Psalms is written, 'blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel [legal advice] of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way [with, alongside of] sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. " Psalms 1:1, KJV.
Those in Congress and White House who are trying to force socialized killing on this nation are evil. They should not be in power. GOD is testing the resolve of the people of this nation by allowing them to have any opportunity to implement a plan of evil premeditated destruction of innocents. When any plan gives 'permission' to killing of the unwanted, then everyone had better be on alert because historically when that happened in any civilization almost the first group to be declared unwanted were the elderly, the sick the handicapped, the less than perfect and then when the 'plan' had annihilated them, the labeled the 'jews' as unwanted as a class and turned their stategy toward eliminating them.
Congress vote NO to the fake reform. Do not codify any killing 'rights'. Do not go along with evil to get along in peace. Do not sacrifice the nation on the altar of Obama.
* Footnote, here is a quote from Aleksandr Solhenitsyn from a speech he made to Harvard Univ about the decline of moral courage and the decline of Western beliefs about the absolute truth.
"A Decline in Courage [. . .]
may be the most striking feature which an outside observer notices in the West in our days. The Western world has lost its civil courage, both as a whole and separately, in each country, each government, each political party and of course in the United Nations. Such a decline in courage is particularly noticeable among the ruling groups and the intellectual elite, causing an impression of loss of courage by the entire society. Of course there are many courageous individuals but they have no determining influence on public life. Political and intellectual bureaucrats show depression, passivity and perplexity in their actions and in their statements and even more so in theoretical reflections to explain how realistic, reasonable as well as intellectually and even morally warranted it is to base state policies on weakness and cowardice. And decline in courage is ironically emphasized by occasional explosions of anger and inflexibility on the part of the same bureaucrats when dealing with weak governments and weak countries, not supported by anyone, or with currents which cannot offer any resistance. But they get tongue-tied and paralyzed when they deal with powerful governments and threatening forces, with aggressors and international terrorists.
Should one point out that from ancient times decline in courage has been considered the beginning of the end?"
6:31 AM 9/29/2009
/s/ Gloria Poole, Denver Colorado 80203 @ 6:17 AM, 29-Sept-2009;
Update again after reading this article about how some morally courageous people in some states are rising up to oppose evil of mandated killing plans:
For the United States to change the basics of government from one where humans have the right to life to one where humans become the property of governments to be disposed of at whim, would require a Constitutional Amendment, not a mere public law. A Constitutional Amendment must be voted on-- ratified by the people--and not just by Congress. Those who profit from killing know that the people would not ratify such an evil; and that is precisely why they are trying sneaky, underhanded camouflaged tricks to deceive all the people all the time. It is always a wrong to kill innocents with premeditation and planning. For the U S Congress to debate under what conditions they will pay for the killing of innocents or mandate such evil, shows how wicked and corrupt they are. The righteous should get up and walk away from those talks of the prodeathers who are laying a plan to kill, maim and destroy at the whim of government. And they should tell loud and clear what they have learned in those discussions to their respective states that elected them to office.
The article in the NY Times about some states opposing the federal killing plans is a start. To publicly discuss the true issues --does the federal government have any such right to mandate how citizens spend their money and one what? Does the federal government have any such authority to codify killing of innocents as a 'right' when GOD said and wrote clearly 'thou shalt not kill'. [Exodus 20:13, Deut 5:17 and in variations of wording at Genesis 9:6, and Matthew 18:14, and John 14:6]?
Does the federal government own the people of this nation? Does the federal government have any right to control all resources? Does the federal government have any lawful authority to mandate any plan to kill to anybody? What is the function of the federal government? If you don't know then google the U S Constitution and read it. It is about 4-5 pages long and then read the Amendments and then read the Declaration of Independence, then read the Emancipation Proclamation also about the 14th Amendment.